Saturday, December 11, 2010
Friday, December 3, 2010
Annotated Bibliography
1) Berger, Warren. Advertising Today. London: Phaidon, 2004. Print.
This source was used during project one, I was assigned to study the history of advertising, starting in the early Late 19th Century to the early 20th Century. This book helped me recognize the founders of certain advertising styles, however it focused more on modern technologies, so I could not use it that much.
2) Burke, Christopher. Paul Renner: the Art of Typography. New York: Princeton Architectural, 1998. Print.
This source was used heavily when learning about Futura in project two. It helped me find out who Paul Renner was as a designer and how is background influenced his designs.
3) Chappell, Warren, and Robert Bringhurst. A Short History of the Printed Word. Point Roberts, WA: Hartley & Marks, 1999. Print.
This book helped me understand the beginnings of the printed word, starting from the Gutenberg Press. I was focused more on the technological advances in the 19th Century that helped advertising flourish.
4) "CMYK Online Portfolio Members." CMYK Magazine. 2006. Web. <http://www.cmykmag.com/site.cfm?page_id=62§_id=7&CFID=823310&CFTOKEN=46251682>.
I used this magazine’s online portfolio database when I was creating my type specimen for project two. By looking at work from other students, I was also to draw some inspiration and follow my own aesthetic.
5) Greenhalgh, Paul. Art Nouveau, 1890-1914. New York: Harry N. Abrams Incorporated, 2000. Print.
For project one, I had to research the art styles of the 19th Century. Art Nouveau was a central style in Europe, this book helped me understand how art nouveau influenced advertising.
6) Hardy, William. A Guide To Art Nouveau. Secaucus, NJ: Quintet Publishing Limited, 1986. Print.
In this source I learned how Art Nouveau came to be, the central artists, and the social scene. I learned how art nouveau influenced all other art forms and became a way of life for the artists.
7) Jury, David. What Is Typography? Mies: RotoVision, 2006. Print.
I got this book very early in the semester from the library, because I was not too sure what typography was. I learned that typography is can create meaning and is so much more than just letters and spaces.
8) Romano, Frank. "Back to the Futura." Analyzing Publishing Technologies 3.8 (2003): 3-5. Print.
This article was kind of deceiving in the title, I though it to be strictly about the typeface Futura. However, this article focused more on how the digital world effected how books, magazines, newspapers, etc. were published. I was interesting helped me understand why Futura is so appealing because of its geometric shapes.
9) Schultze, Jurgen. Art of the 19th Century. New York: Abrams, 1970. Print.
This book gave a great understanding of all the art styles in the 18th and 19th Century. What it means for art to be modern, and how one art movement always was a reaction to the movement before it. How art is very indicative of what is happening socially and politically.
10) Tungate, Mark. Adland: a Global History of Advertising. London: Kogan Page, 2007. Print.
This book has the most I depth history of advertising and it seems to be the only book of its kind. It as the best source I could find that gave me a great understanding of the beginnings of advertising.
Thursday, December 2, 2010
Serif v. Sans Serif
Handwriting
http://www.addictivefonts.com/script/handwritten/free-handwritten-fonts/
I applaud you
So If you are trying to procrastinate or are genuinely interested in what I would consider "typographic architecture", then please click on the link and enjoy.
http://www.thomasbroome.se/mm_1.htm
IF ONLY...
Wednesday, December 1, 2010
Stretch out
Logo Design
Recognizable
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
Downtown
Barneys is in the typeface, Augustus, which draws inspiration from classical and roman styles.
Crate and Barrel is in the ever so popular sans serif, Helvetica.
I could not find the typeface for FIDM, but I get the feeling this type was created in the era of computer innovations. The "D" lacks natural curves, so I assume it might have been a pixel based font.
Although I can't get into the technicalities, I would like to think these typefaces represent the past, present, and future.
Bell Jarring
Monday, October 25, 2010
Typo-O-Lantern
Rules
1- Carve, cut, etch, &c., your typographic design, letterform or mark into a pumpkin or other gourd.
2- Post a photograph (600 x 400 please) of your entry in this thread. Feel free to inform us about your method, inspiration, &c. but the best entries will speak for themselves.
3- As with other type battles, this starts on a Monday and ends this Friday (which happens to be 2 days after Halloween, no points will be reduced with November entries).
Judging & Prizes
As with any street battle, there is no panel of judges and no prize — only the ability to call yourself the best on the block.
Here is photo of my favorite carving, Century Gothic. Along with the skeleton on the side that uses only shapes that can be found in the typeface. Genius.
Böcklin-ized
Friday, October 22, 2010
Wanted
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Friday, September 10, 2010
Type as Image
For this exercise, I used various typefaces that I felt were different but could also flow together very well.
- In the top left, I used Franklin Gothic. The letter is an uppercase "R", the image you see is a close up of where the shoulder and the leg join together, then rotated once left.
- In the bottom left, I used the typeface Photina with the italic font. What you see in the image is an uppercase "Q". You see a close up the tail and the bowl, turned upside down.
- In the top right, I put a lowercase "e" inside an uppercase "Q". The Q is in Futura and the e is in Didot. What you see in the image a round shape with even thickness all around (the bowl of the Q), inside you see another round shape which has an uneven thickness (the counter of the e).
- In the bottom right, The images comes from where the tail and the bowl join in an uppercase "Q" in a Futura typeface.
I used slab sans serif typefaces in the top left and bottom right, to get a feel of rigid lines. In the top right and bottom left, I used more old style serif typefaces. These two classifications have completely different feels, but when you look at the lines of the letters individually they complement one another and create a piece of art that one would not expect to have gotten from letters we use everyday.